Millard's most recent published book, A Flaw From Within: How Women's Higher Status Defies Equal Justice, Violates Men, and Destroys Society, addresses a 'sacred' code that elevates women above men (on a pedestal) that defies equal justice for all and opposes our country's constitution created by men in good conscience. This Euro/Anglo-originated injustice culturally built into the male psyche' (commonly referred to as chivalry) corresponds to the female entitlement mindset that pervades society today. (Only based upon the premise of chivalry could feminism ever exist.) A Pandora's Box is opened that underlies a subversive effort to destroy society which can be easily accomplished when men, discounted as mere pawns for women, openly wield injustice without conscience at women's discretion.
A constant effort to destroy the natural environment, with a cultural influence that clashed with the Native American way of life, presently continues from European arrival. When we see land "developers," supported by government-funded contracts and zoning laws that accommodate turning land into urban sprawl, we are still witnessing today the European take-over of Native America. Sharing the same destiny with the Indians and the buffalo, large unaltered areas of our native land will soon be gone too.
The recent expanded powers of eminent domain, allowing a large private/corporation to take land from a smaller private party, supports the exploitation of our land and its citizens by force for private/corporate gain. The government wielding the bigger stick, rather than protects the people, now as a thug, takes away by force what they have--very similar to how the Native Americans had their land taken from them. The people have been set up by a continuance of the same expansionary practices that took this country from the Indians.
Native Americans multiplied basically to the caring capacity of the land and were all involved in a life sculptured to the natural environment—an original culture with its own habits, beliefs, and customs. The natives didn’t need churches because they lived their beliefs, not as a religion but as their life. Offspring were not considered part of a religious incentive to reproduce either, as is often the case in the European/Anglo culture. The land’s human-caring capacity can be increased, however, without damaging the natural environment with good land-use/management practices implemented. But instead, exploitation and greed, without any foresight, continues to take its toll today in a process that started when Europeans discovered America.
It comes as no surprise that people who are not close to nature, influenced and conditioned by the city and urban environment, are those opposed to sex roles defined by nature. The same foreign concept applied to the environment is thus being applied to humanity. And an exploitative correlation applies to both.
What’s termed development is to the environment what “equality” is to the people and our social structure. One is destroying our land and the other its people. In the past, one earner’s wage, sculptured to support a family, was kept at par with the rate of inflation. However, the current arrangement of two workers for the price of one operates as a double-profit effect benefiting big business/government at the expense of humanity.
Hence, the family has been displaced by the individual for the purpose of the corporate employer, with the typical employee mind-set now molded by corporate philosophy. Jobs are no longer designed, or intended, to support the people (families), but sculptured to suit corporate interests, with government propaganda and policies that support thee employer’s and government’s best interests. Taking two people to gain the equivalent income that only one person and one job provided in the past, along with the attitudes, hatred, laws, human resource policies associated, is a combined effect that has sacrificed male/female unity and the family in our society, along with a more meaningful and valuable quality of life. The most important thing in one’s life is, or was, and should be, a mate and a family. All sociological paths within our society are leading us further from this basic foundation of life and any hope for future generations. Read within to fully understand what Alan Millard has conveyed in Land, People, Politics, and Ignorance.
The Great Salt Lake Regional Book of Facts and Exploration is a composite of the author's knowledge gained from his occupation as a park ranger/naturalist in the Great Salt Lake area and from his own personal interests and experiences pertaining to the natural environment to include culture, geology, ecology, and history. This book was inspired by teachers requesting that Mr. Millard put his knowledge conveyed in his educational presentations into book form. He is also one of the co-authors of Great Salt Lake: An Overview of Change by Wally Gwynn.
Have you ever been lost for defense against feminists who use their own language and terminology to promote their misguided, prejudiced philosophies?
Equality: A Man’s Claim retraces irrational accusations and exposes ill-founded feminist beliefs which have become standard misinformation in today’s society. It offers strong argument to counteract feminist conjecture—an argument which has purposely been kept from you by the media and other sources of feminist propaganda.
Finally, here is a source that takes an unblinking look at the critical issues being used by feminists to destroy the interaction between men and women.
- How is it possible that men are still bound to uphold traditional female expectations (such as opening doors, etc.) when the traditional expectations for women are considered sexist and chauvinistic, and even constitute sexual harassment?
- Concerning domestic violence, how often do we hear, "He deserved it," as compared to "She deserved it"? And why are we more concerned about violence against women when there is more violence against men?
- If men are to be held responsible for supporting a child, then why are they not equally recognized in determining whether a fetus be born or aborted?
- By virtue of excluding one sex, with a hate of that sex and a blind devotion to their own sex, isn't the women's movement an accurate example of a true sex chauvinism?
- Were not men always concerned for both sexes in their traditional family goals and career aspirations? When did men ever sacrifice family or mate for their careers? Did they not, in fact, seek careers for the wife and family.
- What power ever possessed by men is equal to women's complete control over men's sexual (needs) acquisition?
- Under compromising circumstances, isn't a man's right to say yes equal to a woman's right to say no?
- To fulfill his masculine obligation, a normal boy will revolt from abnormal social pressures. Many of the social problems we have today are mere products of the problems caused by a lack of traditional values and sex role models.